Should women be in combat? This is one question that has long divided public opinion into two diametrically opposite point-of-views.
At one hand, you have those who argue that having women in active military services is inherently riskier considering some of their weaknesses. Meanwhile, on the other hand, the proponents argue that gender has nothing to do with patriotism and the desire to render selfless services when the need arises. While a lot of the jobs in the armed forces are equally accommodative to both men and women, there are some roles that men are generally biologically better suited for. Some people argue that this difference in physical capabilities of men and women could potentially prevent integrated units perform optimally during training as well as actual combat situations.
While there’s no doubt that some women will be as physically as fit as their male counterparts, the majority won’t. While it’s possible to have the qualified women in combat role without lowering the bar, their small number might eventually render the costs associated with the revamp of the logistical, disciplinary, and regulatory frameworks impractical.
Admittedly, both men and women prisoners of war are at risks of severe torture by enemy soldiers. However, it has been traditionally observed that during war, misogynistic societies actively deploy social abuse as a strategy to demoralize the enemy. To all of the much talked about things let’s see the topic from a different angle altogether. The purpose of this article is not to take sides but to objectively highlight some of the most important pros of having women in
The purpose of this article is not to take sides but to objectively highlight some of the most important pros of having women in active military and combat roles. This is how we can change the mindset and understand how easily women can withstand adverse situation with grace and courage. It’s high time now, we support women and talk about their fair chances of getting equal rights and roles.
Gender vs Ability:
Logic dictates that as long as an applicant is qualified for a position, gender should not be an issue at all. It is not difficult at all to find women who are physically in much better shape than many men who are sent to combat. Moreover, today’s wars are far more reliant on technology and decision-making skills than on brute strength.
To integrate women into combat units, they will first have to be provided with rigorous physical and psychological training. If more and more women opt to join the armed forces, it might pave the way for a cultural change over time, curbing the patriarchal mindset in many societies.
Wider talent pool:
A mixed gender force can strengthen the capacities of an armed force. Widening the applicant pool almost always will guarantee more willing recruits. The competition will be higher and subsequently, the quality of new recruits will improve over time.
Access to education:
Women who would otherwise be unable to afford school will be allowed access to education after joining the military. Not just education and a stable source of income, it will also ensure them many other benefits extended to armed forces personals.
From the above it’s wide and clear that no power in the world that could stop women to conquer any field. Hence, there is no doubt in understanding how easily women could be battle-hardened enough to cope with all kinds of torture and to handle such traumatic experiences.